Sunday, February 13, 2011

Tri-State Water Wars Liam/Ben

Georgia, Alabama,and Florida have been arguing over something different than who’s better at football for almost 20 years. These three states have been arguing about allocation of water from two large bodies of water that cross their borders. The outcome is a critical, environmental decision in this area. Georgia is trying to make sure that it has enough water for its expanding population especially in metro Atlanta. Alabama is worried that if Atlanta uses too much water it won’t have enough for its needs. Florida wants to make sure that it can sustain its very successful shellfish industry.
Water used to be very abundant, but water issues began with droughts in the 1980s causing debates over water that have gotten progressively worse. The drought in 2007 was the most recent one when Lake Lanier got twenty feet below normal level. Some groups of people are proposing that Lake Lanier be raised two feet above it normal level to add 26 billion gallons of extra storage incase of emergencies. Georgia says it has the right to the water in it’s rivers and lakes, but Alabama and Florida blame Georgia for using to much water and not enough is getting down stream to them and that the lack of water is destroying ecosystems down stream especially in the gulf.

After the Chattahoochee River enters Florida it becomes the Apalachicola River. By the time the Apalachicola enters the gulf it is very low and polluted. If too little water flows into Apalachicola Bay then salt level increase. This was especially bad during the drought of 2007. The high salt levels kill oysters and other animals caught in commercial fishing. This threatens the lively hood of the fisherman and ruins the local economy because commercial fishing is one of the most important businesses in the region.
The three states are involved in a court case in the United States DistrictCourt. In 2009 the judge ruled that metro Atlanta has very little right to take a lot of water from Lake Lanier even though almost 3 million people in the Atlanta area get most of their water from that lake. Georgia population has doubled since the 1960s and more people means it takes more water to sustain them. The judge has given these three states until July 2012 to negotiate a deal. If these states don’t reach an agreement the judge will order severe limits on the amount of water that can be withdrawn from the lake. The state of Georgia has filed an appeal that will be heard on March 9, 2011.
Georgia must continue to conserve water in order to prepare for the drastic measures that will be imposed in 2011. The Georgia legislature passed some laws in 2010 to help with Conservation. Conservation is important but Georgia needs to find ways to increase their water supply. If Georgia is not alowed to use much water from Lake Lanier this will have a huge impact on the environment, agriculture, and the economy of this state.


Citations:
"Georgia Once Prayed For Rain, Now Plans For Drought : NPR." NPR : National Public Radio : News & Analysis, World, US, Music & Arts : NPR. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125190243>.


"Water Wars Background — Alabama Rivers Alliance." Alabama Water Rally Online Registration Is Open! — Alabama Rivers Alliance. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.alabamarivers.org/current-work/water-wars>.

"Tri-State Water Wars History." Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.chattahoochee.org/tri-state-water-wars-history.php>.


"Tri-state Water Wars: Act Now on Water Contingency Plans | Ajc.com." Atlanta News, Sports, Atlanta Weather, Business News | Ajc.com. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.ajc.com/opinion/tri-state-water-wars-527806.html>.

"Tri-State Water Wars." Southern Environmental Law Center. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.southernenvironment.org/cases/tri_state_water_wars_al_ga_fl>.

"Arguments Set in Tri-state Water Wars Case." The Augusta Chronicle. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2011-01-26/arguments-set-tri-state-water-wars-case>.

No comments:

Post a Comment